老师您好能否帮我讲解下下面这个文章考试时该如何读，我读完这种文章压根不知道在说什么，只知道在讲ocean basin形成机制的几种理论。No very satisfactory account of the mechanism that caused the formation of the ocean basins has yet been given. The traditional view supposes that the upper mantle of the earth behaves as a liquid when it is subjected to small forces for long periods and that differences in temperature under oceans and continents are sufficient to produce convection in the mantle of the earth with rising convection currents under the mid-ocean ridges and sinking currents under the continents. Theoretically, this convection would carry the continental plates along as though they were on a conveyor belt (conveyor belt: n. 传送带) and would provide the forces needed to produce the split that occurs along the ridge. This view may be correct: it has the advantage that the currents are driven by temperature differences that themselves depend on the position of the continents. Such a back-coupling, in which the position of the moving plate has an impact on the forces that move it, could produce complicated and varying motions. On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is. Also it is difficult to see how the theory applies to the plate between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the ridge in the Indian Ocean. This plate is growing on both sides, and since there is no intermediate trench, the two ridges must be moving apart. It would be odd if the rising convection currents kept exact pace with them. An alternative theory is that the sinking part of the plate, which is denser than the hotter surrounding mantle, pulls the rest of the plate after it. Again it is difficult to see how this applies to the ridge in the South Atlantic, where neither the African nor the American plate has a sinking part. Another possibility is that the sinking plate cools the neighboring mantle and produces convection currents that move the plates. This last theory is attractive because it gives some hope of explaining the enclosed seas, such as the Sea of Japan. These seas have a typical oceanic floor, except that the floor is overlaid by several kilometers of sediment. Their floors have probably been sinking for long periods. It seems possible that a sinking current of cooled mantle material on the upper side of the plate might be the cause of such deep basins. The enclosed seas are an important feature of the earth’s surface, and seriously require explanation because, in addition to the enclosed seas that are developing at present behind island arcs, there are a number of older ones of possibly similar origin, such as the Gulf of Mexico, the Black Sea, and perhaps the North Sea.

请唐瑭老师答疑：这道题最后一句划定的范围是hunt和A数量的关系，BCD能够自己排除，A项说人口增加，我觉得人口增加不一定hunt就会增加再影响人口，所以无关，但E项，A在人少的场合被目击的次数多，不就代表A多了是因为那里人少，hunt肯定是人来完成的，人少就少有hunt。

请唐瑭老师答疑： 我的思路是：原文最后一句划定的范围是对于延误来说，天气等不可控因素是一部分，但可控因素是有明显下降的，大致就是延误的因素。可以排除BCE选项，A选项低估airline error的占比，而D项，不可控因素在上升，为什么A错误而D正确呢？谢谢老师！

请唐瑭老师答疑：请唐老师用他的思路讲一下这道题。谢谢老师！

请唐瑭老师答疑：还不太能够理解为什么选D选项，能讲下这道题嘛，想知道是不是从一开始思路就错了。谢谢老师！

请唐瑭老师答疑：这个题可以不用看原文，直接在题干中总结范围：suncrop追求less profit，C项中cattle ranching高税的profits会产生比其他工业的profits更高，而E项中，开展RT的成本要比开展CR的成本高，对profit来说中间还有一步推理

请徐小梅老师答疑：

1.问题1 一个数的余数问题额，怎么看他除以248395的余数他的余数是与他各个位数上的和加起来除以这几个数的余数相等么？ 2.在质因数分解中，为什么每个分解出的质数的幂+1相乘等于他质数的个数，能解释一下原理吗？

没有找到这个细节题在哪里，好像没有怎么理解文章的意思。文章是在讲biologist和historian的explanation的方式以及biologist是以historian explaination为基础，然后发现了一些漏洞吗？ 希望张老师回答一下🥺

请教一下小梅老师，在用间接法时 所有情况-相邻捆绑=两个I没有挨在一起的情况 我的笔记上写的所有情况的表达式是C25A33 但现在自己看不懂了，希望老师讲下为什么

这题E选项是对的，但consumers主语后面谓语动词为什么是一般现在时，整个句子不是过去式么？