问答
Issue Essay
题目：
Analytical!
提问：
学员 B18579107185:
老师您好，这道题的题目有一点看不懂，请问是什么意思以及为什么选d？
解答：
徐小梅老师：
Sentence Correction
题目：
On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins, immigrants found that on arrival in the United States they had to surrender all of the gold they had brought with them.
提问：
学员 B13761863833:
这个because of 后面➕ N 不能➕句子 所以这边 a law…一直到to hold 都是修饰？谢谢
解答：
金栩竹老师：
Critical Reasoning
题目：
The traditional treatment of strep infections has been a seven-day course of antibiotics, either penicillin or erythromycin. However, since many patients stop taking those drugs within three days, reinfection is common in cases where those drugs are prescribed. A new antibiotic requires only a three-day course of treatment. Therefore, reinfection will probably be less common in cases where the new antibiotic is prescribed than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed.
提问：
学员 B13602520585:
排除无关选项A，B，D，剩下C和E；好像唐瑭老师说只看逻辑题最后一句？E选项说“无论新药还是老药”与原文逻辑最后一句（问题所问）的where the new antibiotic is prescribed 冲突，故选了C
解答：
陆旭老师：
做GMAT的逻辑题并没有可以不用动脑子的捷径。学生说到：“E选项说“无论新药还是老药”与原文逻辑最后一句（当然也是Argument的结论，问题所要加强的）的where the new antibiotic is prescribed 冲突。” 但你为什么不接着读”than in cases where either penicillin or erythromycin is prescribed“，加起来不还是“无论新药还是老药”。但这又能说明什么问题哪？不读懂意思就做判断不就是猜吗？！E选项是说不论新药和旧药病人吃了后都是3天就觉得自己病愈了。那当然病人不会在三天之前就停药了！因为新药3天就杀光所有细菌，因此新药不会导致感染复发，而老药要7天，因此老药搞不定。知道为什么病人吃抗生素没吃到7天就停吃吗？因为刚吃了3，4天症状没了自己就觉得病彻底好了，那干嘛还接着吃药？人只有在病痛中才会记得药不能停呀！
Sentence Correction
题目：
Caribou are wary animals with excellent hearing, so stalking them over the treeless landscape, getting close enough to kill it with nothing but a handheld lance, as Dorset people did, required exceptional hunting skill.
提问：
学员 B15110173072:
这道题为什么so后面要加to do，不是应该加句子么？并且B和C有什么区别么？
解答：
王文静老师：
Critical Reasoning
题目：
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
提问：
学员 B13139219625:
老师你好，在这道题中我的纠结选项是D和E。D选项说，除去这个S，不会有其它的物质会提高酒精过敏。那就会说明，除去S在酒精里不会让人过敏。是不是这个apart有影响呢。谢谢老师。
解答：
唐瑭老师：
逻辑题最忌讳的就是主观性推测。文中观点是如果对sulfites过敏的人要喝酒就喝酿酒商酿制的不添加sulfites的酒就好了。E排除掉了一种可能质疑观点的因素，就是酿酒商没有加s进入酒，但是酒里自带的可能性被排除了，增加了观点的可信度。（具体可参照我上课对GWD11里面16题测量黄金那道题目的讲解，选项设置思路类似）而D讲的除了s，么有其他物质增加过敏反应对于S导致过敏的观点并没有任何影响，所以无关选项。
