题目:
Many people suffer an allergic reaction to certain sulfites, including those that are commonly added to wine as preservatives. However, since there are several winemakers who add sulfites to none of the wines they produce, people who would like to drink wine but are allergic to sulfites can drink wines produced by these winemakers without risking an allergic reaction to sulfites.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
提问:
学员 B13139219625:
老师你好,在这道题中我的纠结选项是D和E。D选项说,除去这个S,不会有其它的物质会提高酒精过敏。那就会说明,除去S在酒精里不会让人过敏。是不是这个apart有影响呢。谢谢老师。
解答:
唐瑭老师:
逻辑题最忌讳的就是主观性推测。文中观点是如果对sulfites过敏的人要喝酒就喝酿酒商酿制的不添加sulfites的酒就好了。E排除掉了一种可能质疑观点的因素,就是酿酒商没有加s进入酒,但是酒里自带的可能性被排除了,增加了观点的可信度。(具体可参照我上课对GWD11里面16题测量黄金那道题目的讲解,选项设置思路类似)而D讲的除了s,么有其他物质增加过敏反应对于S导致过敏的观点并没有任何影响,所以无关选项。