还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
文章：
Mourdet Winery: Danville Winery's new wine was introduced to compete with our most popular wine, which is sold in a distinctive tall, black bottle. Danville uses a similar bottle. Thus, it is likely that many customers intending to buy our wine will mistakenly buy theirs instead.Danville Winery: Not so. The two bottles can be readily distinguished: the label on ours, but not on theirs, is gold colored.
题目：
Which of the following, if true, most undermines Danville Winery's response?
选项:
A、Gold is the background color on the label of many of the wines produced by Danville Winery. When the bottles are viewed side by side, Danville Winery's bottle is perceptibly taller than Mourdet Winery's.
B、Danville Winery, unlike Mourdet Winery, displays its wine's label prominently in advertisements.
C、It is common for occasional purchasers to buy a bottle of wine on the basis of a general impression of the most obvious feature of the bottle.
D、Many popular wines are sold in bottles of a standard design.
答案:
D
提问：
每日一题
解答：
点赞0
阅读7119
提问：
请教唐瑭老师：选了A，因为题干的重点是商标是金黄的所以两个瓶子容易区分，A说金黄是标签的底色，更有关，不明白D为何有关
解答：
点赞0
阅读6450
提问：
请英吉老师回答：本题我在B和D中犹豫，但是D的逻辑还是没想明白。D中说消费者会根据一个瓶子的主要特征来购买，DW也说自己有金色标签所以很明显，为啥D选项就能削弱DW的话？我做题的时候理解D是加强啊？而且D里面也没有说obvious feature of the bottle 是label还是tall, black，如果是label那么就是加强了DW的话啊！
麻烦老师解答！
解答：
点赞0
阅读6474
提问：
这个题目每次纠结的点是D选项的“occasional purchasers”；我的理解是因为occasional purchasers只是偶尔买酒，那么对Mourdet Winery的生意影响应该没有那么大才对。我理解的逻辑链是：Mourdet Winery认为：Danville Winery's 因为酒瓶一样导致消费者会买错酒；Danville Winery认为金色label会让消费者把酒的品牌区分开来，所以不会买错酒。原文要求undermines Danville Winery的推理，是不是说只要有人（哪怕只是很少一部分人）还是会买错酒（由于无法区分酒的外观）就可以undermines Danville Winery的推理了？谢谢！
解答：
点赞1
阅读6506
提问：
每日一题
解答：
点赞0
阅读7120
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
