Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

为什么critique和envisioning不算并列？划线部分做同位语作用，为何不能用起伴随作用的DE？as well as是否既可以用在两者比较又可以用在三者？

请数学老师解答

请问数学老师 条件中 each more than 3 feet from the nearest wall 这个条件有什么用？再说下思路 谢谢老师

请问数学老师 条件2怎么可以快速推算结果

老师 我不太懂什么k一定是4的倍数呢？

ken老师这道题目答案对吗？为什么说两个条件中的方程是同一个方程啊，我算出来不一样，当条件1&2同时存在时，两个方程是有两个交点，应该就是可以判断出（a,b)的值吧？

请问数学老师 这个题如何在短时间内快速得出答案

ken老师 这道题目黄色部分我不太明白，An和n各自代表什么意思？我以为An代表的整数列所有数的合，那n不可能小于100呀，好奇怪

麻烦金老师回答，主要的困惑在于AB两个选项。一个that位置的不同，和will 和 would 的不同。刚开始我的思路是旅客会更多的使用旅行机构这件事是一个预测，没发生的，虚拟语气所以就错选了B.will 和would 的区别是 will 表达的感觉更确定一点吗？

麻烦金老师回答，这题看到DIGGING 这个动作是人发出的 不可能是化石发出的，排除AB ，C 里面的it 指代不是很清楚。对比DE， 这个化石来自那里这个部分的内容比较长所以D 选项是用了一个从句来说明的意思吗？就是关于DE选项的appears 和 APPEAR 这个差一点我不是很清晰，还是说D这个答案的what 这个选项引导的从句直接修饰到bones上，所以胜出？