Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

请数学老师解答 谢谢

请数学老师解答，谢谢

请数学老师解答 谢谢

请数学老师解答 谢谢

一家餐厅有A B两个list的side dishes，两个list都不重样，给出一共有18种搭配方式，问B list里有几个菜 条件1：AB一共有11个菜 条件2：A有2个菜 请数学老师解答 谢谢老师

一个圆内接长方形，问长方形周长是多少？ 条件1：圆半径为2； 条件2：长方形的一条边是2 请数学老师讲解，谢谢老师

请问下金老师，先通过主谓一致排除a，通过in doing sth “在哪方面干什么”意思不对排除ce，剩下bd怎么选择呢？感觉时态没法做选择，前面一个用using 一个用by the use of …使用过动词优于名词来最后选择b吗？

想请问Tina老师，这个题通过后面画线部分比较选项可以排出ad，cwith结构修饰主句主谓关系不恰当排除c，同位语be中summarize前面那群borrowers更好，但是be比较，我觉得e更好，因为that感觉又是引导一个如records这个名词的同位语解释说明什么样的一个热cords，但是答案选b，该怎么权衡呢？

请老师完整解答一下这道题解题思路，我选的A，认为后面是一个介词短语修饰语。

王文静老师你好，就这道题目，我特地查了字典，with可以表示一件事情的factor和这件事情的关系的，换句话说，C选项我读到with，我第一反应就是自动就理解为后面的两个条件（factor）是导致output tripled的原因，所以认为这句话即处理了因果关系也表达了两个factor之前的并列关系。麻烦老师指出我的语法理解问题