Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

请问数学老师 条件2为什么成立 谢谢老师

老师您好，这道阅读理解不会做，用定位的方法读了原文也没太懂为什么选D

文章的最后一句话回答了这个问题，也就是C选项，我不懂为什么正确答案是B

ken老师你好，这道题目我的思路是设97、98、99依次为a、b、c，根据题目得出b=C+y; b=a+x。条件1）x>y，可以得出a<c。 第二个条件不太懂。而且这道题目的开始的的less、 more in 1999，这些术语我转化成公式就浪费了半个小时，想问老师有没有更高效的解决办法？

请数学老师讲解下思路

麻烦老师给我讲解一下这一题，通过The body…was that of the man ，身体是那个男人的一部分，而不是身体是那个男人。这个点排除ABC. DE关于时态部分不是很清晰

请数学老师解答下第三个为什么不行

请数学老师帮我解答下，再讲下怎么画图 谢谢老师

麻烦老师给我辨析一下图1和图2，关于图1那题当时选错之后机构老师给我解答的是40 to 44 million years 是一个时间区间，不能用estimate at 因为 at 有精确到某个点的意味。那么图2的正确答案是不是因为3.47 billion years 是一个精确的年份所以要用 at 。。

麻烦老师给我解答一下这题，这题BUT后面主要想表达的核心语意是 家庭用电少于百分之一和家里面的电仍然是由蜡烛提供。我觉得B 顺着读下去也能表达这个语意，就是 我觉得AB 都能表达这个语意，关于两者的差异我不是很清晰 麻烦老师帮我辨析一下