Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

麻烦金帮我解答一下这一题，我的思路是看主语“T的风格和选择”，先不看破折号里面的修饰内容，然后根据主谓一致排除了ACD ，然后看BE，然后就没什么思路，这题是考时态，还是比较？就是关于这个AS AS 我知道的点是它一半用于同级比较，然后根据as 后面的代词去接着判断？

三个因子怎么得出X=a²，请在详细推理一下，不是很懂

老师，这道题根据您的答案，定义应该是1000＝2的9次方乘以X。 但是这样的话这个X就不能是整数了，不符合上面92题的定义呀。 所以没想明白，觉得应该还是1000＝2*2*2*5*5*5。选E

从条件1看，p也可以等于32呀！ 32是2的5次方，所以的质数可以写成1和2，同时为了满足＞1的条件。只是只能是2，所以不能准确推理呀 只有当两个条件合起来，p是33或35时才能满足。因此应该选C不是A

请数学老师说下思路

张老师你好，这道题目我不太懂C为什么错。因为这道题目我的方法是直接定位到黄色highlight部分，然后看这句话的前后句子，因为前面一句话看着好像比较无关，我就重点看了后面一句话，说了这些guilds的women是有legal和economic的privileges ，所以我一看C就对了。然后正确答案是A，不太懂怎么才能选对，也不理解c为什么是错的，虽然A看了这句话也对，但是考试的时候做这种题目我为了节约时间通常都是只看highlight附近的句子的，求指教！然后这类型的题目大概难度系数是多少？谢谢

老师，请问这倒是题目的考点是什么！C选项中哪里错了？我理解的是with it的it指带不清楚，求老师指教！谢谢！

which of the following about the insects from which animals acquire carotenoids？老师您好怎么判断这句话是倒装呢？我理解的意思就是昆虫从动物获取carotenoids

麻烦金老师帮我解决下这一道题，此句的核心语意是A这个人开始翻译 I 这个作品，后面一个同位语从句进一步解释这个工作花了多少年和S对它的评价。根绝a work that and that 这个平行结构先排出了 A E ,然后C 答案的 had taken 和 began 时间点上是冲突的，先开始了，才有完成的事，所以had taken 过去完成时在这里用法不正确。对比B D ，文学批评家S 宣称最好的译品；文学批评家S宣称它做为最好的译品。。我觉得后者更好，尽管有一瞬间也纠结了IT的指代问题，麻烦老师帮我辨析一下，正确答案B“S宣称最好的作品in。。”感觉话没说完整。

请问老师，这里的reduced by 150,是减到150，还是剪了150