Years before the advent of plate tectonics―the widely accepted theory, developed in the mid-1960's, the holds that the major features of Earth's surface are created by the horizontal motions of Earth's outer shell, or lithosphere―a similar theory was rejected by the geological community. In 1912, Alfred Wegener proposed, in a widely debated theory that came to be called continental drift, that Earth's continents were mobile. To most geologists today, Wegener's The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility of pieces of Earth's crust; the essential difference between oceanic and continental crust; and a causal connection between horizontal displacements and the formation of mountain chains. Yet despite the considerable overlap between Wegener's concepts and the later widely embraced plate tectonics theory, and despite the fact that continental drift theory presented a possible solution to the problem of the origin of mountains at a time when existing explanations were seriously in doubt, in its day Wegener's theory was rejected by the vast majority of geologists. Most geologists and many historians today believe that Wegener's theory was rejected because of its lack of an adequate mechanical basis. Stephen Jay Gould, for example, argues that continental drift theory was rejected because it did not explain how continents could move through an apparently solid oceanic floor. However, as Anthony Hallam has pointed out, many scientific phenomena, such as the ice ages, have been accepted before they could be fully explained. The most likely cause for the rejection of continental drift―a cause that has been largely ignored because we consider Wegener's theory to have been validated by the theory of plate tectonics―is the nature of the evidence that was put forward to support it. Most of Wegener's evidence consisted of homologies―similarities of patterns and forms based on direct observations of rocks in the field, supported by the use of hammers, hand lenses, and field notebooks. In contrast, the data supporting plate tectonics were impressively geophysical―instrumental determinations of the physical properties of Earth garnered through the use of seismographs, magnetometers, and computers. 我选了E considerable overlap前面是despite XXX说明这个是个成就，他和后面的反对W的观点的事情是相反的。所以感觉D说用这个词的目的是解释为啥W理论。请老师辨析DE！谢谢！

想问一下老师这题的定位思路是如何的，大后天就考了。答案是C，还想听一下D的话为什么不能选

想问下老师这题的思路。为什么B选项不对，对于比例是没办法说明坏的多还是少，需要一个说人数一样多来补充证明说motorized确实比non m多。为什么要D

想问下老师这题的思路是怎么的，assumption的题目应该怎么做，之前是老师的方法是说把assumption看成是一个argument的补充原因，好像在这里用不上？有点急

想问下老师这题的思路是怎么样的，快考试了有点急

想让老师理一下这篇阅读的文章结构还有解决下第4题

想问问唐塘老师这题思路是什么样的，我做的时候只get到了预算是由税的2%来的，然后一个公司现在由1%的这个城的雇佣员工组成（不知道对不对），还有想问下这题在考试里大概是什么水平的题目

想问下唐塘老师，这题我没看懂题目的意思，查了意思后说是调和xxxx，也不是很明白，然后我看说c讲了两个不同状态的婴儿，对于牛奶的吸收的不同，跟原文里呈现了两种婴儿的比较比较一样，就选了，这思路对么？答案是c

想请问下唐塘老师这题的思路是什么，感觉一点思路都没有

请王文静老师答疑

想问一下may老师，如果这一题把题干改成 a sequence of 6n conseuctive integers, 那是像这样分析吗。