Years before the advent of plate tectonics―the widely accepted theory, developed in the mid-1960's, the holds that the major features of Earth's surface are created by the horizontal motions of Earth's outer shell, or lithosphere―a similar theory was rejected by the geological community. In 1912, Alfred Wegener proposed, in a widely debated theory that came to be called continental drift, that Earth's continents were mobile. To most geologists today, Wegener's The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility of pieces of Earth's crust; the essential difference between oceanic and continental crust; and a causal connection between horizontal displacements and the formation of mountain chains. Yet despite the considerable overlap between Wegener's concepts and the later widely embraced plate tectonics theory, and despite the fact that continental drift theory presented a possible solution to the problem of the origin of mountains at a time when existing explanations were seriously in doubt, in its day Wegener's theory was rejected by the vast majority of geologists. Most geologists and many historians today believe that Wegener's theory was rejected because of its lack of an adequate mechanical basis. Stephen Jay Gould, for example, argues that continental drift theory was rejected because it did not explain how continents could move through an apparently solid oceanic floor. However, as Anthony Hallam has pointed out, many scientific phenomena, such as the ice ages, have been accepted before they could be fully explained. The most likely cause for the rejection of continental drift―a cause that has been largely ignored because we consider Wegener's theory to have been validated by the theory of plate tectonics―is the nature of the evidence that was put forward to support it. Most of Wegener's evidence consisted of homologies―similarities of patterns and forms based on direct observations of rocks in the field, supported by the use of hammers, hand lenses, and field notebooks. In contrast, the data supporting plate tectonics were impressively geophysical―instrumental determinations of the physical properties of Earth garnered through the use of seismographs, magnetometers, and computers. 我选了E considerable overlap前面是despite XXX说明这个是个成就，他和后面的反对W的观点的事情是相反的。所以感觉D说用这个词的目的是解释为啥W理论。请老师辨析DE！谢谢！

请问这道题为什么选E啊，D选项错在哪里

这题答案是选A吗？条件一我带进去算是可以的，具体是怎么推出来的呢？

求唐老师解答一下, 您在明星蛋壳小班-逻辑-第一天-1小时28分左右, 用实验田的镁盐产量阐述"有关"与"无关"逻辑时, 讲到一个选项-"实验田形状"-同产量无关, 但是这里是否也可以理解成, "实验田的形状"同产量有关. 正如之前用到的一个例子-问"吃了什么?"-答""

请徐老师解答，谢谢，这题您看有除了图里那种套公式之外的做法吗，感觉我用插入法捆绑法也做不了，图里那种用公式套的方法感觉太死板没有真正理解题目

请问王文静老师这题的解题思路，谢谢老师

请问王文静老师这题的解题思路，谢谢老师

答案为B，为什么C不可以，but和because可以连用吗

请徐老师详细解答一下，谢谢，看这题是找因数，但是我看7 310 511 716 323这几个数之间也没有共同的因数啊，也没法把X提出来，因为最后30那项也没X，是不是这题出错了。。

这个题为啥不选E, E是平行结构啊，答案是D, D里面出现了but also不对吧？ 因为原题里没not only啊哈哈@唐老师

这道题我选D,答案选B, 答案不对吧，答案最后是these, 但是后面所接的原文是单数的问题private ownership, 所以。答案只能先把B排除了，老师请问这个题应该选什么？