Years before the advent of plate tectonics―the widely accepted theory, developed in the mid-1960's, the holds that the major features of Earth's surface are created by the horizontal motions of Earth's outer shell, or lithosphere―a similar theory was rejected by the geological community. In 1912, Alfred Wegener proposed, in a widely debated theory that came to be called continental drift, that Earth's continents were mobile. To most geologists today, Wegener's The origin of Continents and Oceans appears an impressive and prescient document, containing several of the essential presumptions underlying plate tectonics theory: the horizontal mobility of pieces of Earth's crust; the essential difference between oceanic and continental crust; and a causal connection between horizontal displacements and the formation of mountain chains. Yet despite the considerable overlap between Wegener's concepts and the later widely embraced plate tectonics theory, and despite the fact that continental drift theory presented a possible solution to the problem of the origin of mountains at a time when existing explanations were seriously in doubt, in its day Wegener's theory was rejected by the vast majority of geologists. Most geologists and many historians today believe that Wegener's theory was rejected because of its lack of an adequate mechanical basis. Stephen Jay Gould, for example, argues that continental drift theory was rejected because it did not explain how continents could move through an apparently solid oceanic floor. However, as Anthony Hallam has pointed out, many scientific phenomena, such as the ice ages, have been accepted before they could be fully explained. The most likely cause for the rejection of continental drift―a cause that has been largely ignored because we consider Wegener's theory to have been validated by the theory of plate tectonics―is the nature of the evidence that was put forward to support it. Most of Wegener's evidence consisted of homologies―similarities of patterns and forms based on direct observations of rocks in the field, supported by the use of hammers, hand lenses, and field notebooks. In contrast, the data supporting plate tectonics were impressively geophysical―instrumental determinations of the physical properties of Earth garnered through the use of seismographs, magnetometers, and computers. 我选了E considerable overlap前面是despite XXX说明这个是个成就，他和后面的反对W的观点的事情是相反的。所以感觉D说用这个词的目的是解释为啥W理论。请老师辨析DE！谢谢！

这道题感觉A也好对

感觉C对因为可以降低运输成本

请翻译下however后这句话的意思

老师请教这个中文的题 答案是D，但我选的B，我认为条件1是不能判断出来的 第二张图片是当时老师上课讲的，请问蓝色的0.1a是怎么得出来的啊

老师，这个变体条件得出来的不是整除的式子，为啥能满足题干条件？谢谢

老师，这道题有点困惑，题目问的是最大公约数是多少，为什么直接选B，最大公约数是1？

这个题ACDE都错在哪里了呢？为什么选B呀

这题以前上学时就没见过，老师可帮忙讲下逻辑和原理么？

老师，这里的+63看不太懂，谢谢

请问这题里说一个化学反应等于一个数的平方，同时又等于另一个数的倒数，那这样，这个平方和这个倒数应该是相等的关系，为什么是一个相乘的关系然后再等于R呢？