还没有登录哦!

[Issue Essay]

试题详情

题目:

Analytical!

选项:

答案:

提问:

Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

解答:

点赞0
阅读265888
解答: sysadmin

提问:

因为X和Y都是正整数,则只会发生两种情况,(X,Y)——(5,2)和(8,1)所以条件一说了X<8 则只会出现(5,2)的唯一情况,成立!条件二说Y>1 则也只能确定(5,2)的唯一情况,也成立呀!我选的D,就是一直找不出我的思维漏洞在哪,求解!

解答:

点赞0
阅读261792
解答: 徐小梅老师

提问:

老师,听了OG精讲课程,老师是按照每个truck里面装三个shipments来解答的,但在这道题中并没有说到每个truck里装三个shipment,所以我觉得两个条件分别都不能,但合起来可以解答题目问题。请问我的思路有什么问题吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读260905
解答: 徐小梅老师

提问:

这题考点是so as to吗,为何这题E选项不能理解为to convert和for establishing平行呢

解答:

点赞0
阅读260591
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

请问培月老师,看到选项我直接把DE排除了,因为airline被期望增加。。。这个语义很奇怪,应该是希望航空公司主动希望通过购买飞机来增加增加呀。所以在ABC里选了一个相对好的,请问这里的语义逻辑怎么考虑啊?

解答:

点赞0
阅读260327
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

老师 428题我能选出来B(根据原文has led to...)但是在当时做题时我同时在纠结E选项。因为我不确定文中是在说说服还是在说需求。麻烦请郭培月老师解答一下~

解答:

点赞0
阅读258745
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

我知道A和B错了,但是有个疑惑,““逗号”+非谓语”,所以A和B这里的prevented难道不是修饰主句的主语sound吗?为什么在这里用于修饰distances了呢。是老师说错了,还是我记错了?

解答:

点赞0
阅读259238
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

C和E的排除中,老师给出的排除方法是在没有硬伤的情况下,主动优于被动,所以选择C选项。但是我当时的思路是,C当中的stationary在that的从句当中,只修饰到了troughts,而E当中的stationary则同时修饰crests和 troughts,在不知道troughts 和 crests是什么意思的情况下,我认为同时修饰两个要比单独修饰troughts好。就像以前那道uncontrolled和that was controlled那道题。

解答:

点赞1
阅读258899
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

CDE排除的过程中,我的思路是who怎么能够就近修饰law firms呢,所以就选择了D,我也确实看到yet了,但是我认为可以做副词可以放过。请问我的思路有什么问题吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读260213
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

请问老师,这题条件二也推不出啊!条件二还有可能a大于1,这时候就不能确定x大于0了,所以是否答案应该选E?

解答:

点赞0
阅读258851
解答: 徐小梅老师

提问:

最后留了ADE 觉得now部分应该作为结果伴随,排除A,在DE中选,因为about离knowledge越近越好,选了E 我想问问老师,1.这种ADE最后只有结构上的不同时,是由于句意重心导致选A的吗,着重强调现在有conclusion而非过去的研究;2.DE之间的对比,E把over 20年放中间来使得about。。离knowledge近是比D更好的吗。

解答:

点赞0
阅读258412
解答: 金栩竹老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询