Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

请问这道题为什么选E啊，D选项错在哪里

这题答案是选A吗？条件一我带进去算是可以的，具体是怎么推出来的呢？

求唐老师解答一下, 您在明星蛋壳小班-逻辑-第一天-1小时28分左右, 用实验田的镁盐产量阐述"有关"与"无关"逻辑时, 讲到一个选项-"实验田形状"-同产量无关, 但是这里是否也可以理解成, "实验田的形状"同产量有关. 正如之前用到的一个例子-问"吃了什么?"-答""

请徐老师解答，谢谢，这题您看有除了图里那种套公式之外的做法吗，感觉我用插入法捆绑法也做不了，图里那种用公式套的方法感觉太死板没有真正理解题目

请问王文静老师这题的解题思路，谢谢老师

请问王文静老师这题的解题思路，谢谢老师

答案为B，为什么C不可以，but和because可以连用吗

请徐老师详细解答一下，谢谢，看这题是找因数，但是我看7 310 511 716 323这几个数之间也没有共同的因数啊，也没法把X提出来，因为最后30那项也没X，是不是这题出错了。。

这个题为啥不选E, E是平行结构啊，答案是D, D里面出现了but also不对吧？ 因为原题里没not only啊哈哈@唐老师

这道题我选D,答案选B, 答案不对吧，答案最后是these, 但是后面所接的原文是单数的问题private ownership, 所以。答案只能先把B排除了，老师请问这个题应该选什么？