Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

想问一下老师这题的定位思路是如何的，大后天就考了。答案是C，还想听一下D的话为什么不能选

想问下老师这题的思路。为什么B选项不对，对于比例是没办法说明坏的多还是少，需要一个说人数一样多来补充证明说motorized确实比non m多。为什么要D

想问下老师这题的思路是怎么的，assumption的题目应该怎么做，之前是老师的方法是说把assumption看成是一个argument的补充原因，好像在这里用不上？有点急

想问下老师这题的思路是怎么样的，快考试了有点急

想让老师理一下这篇阅读的文章结构还有解决下第4题

想问问唐塘老师这题思路是什么样的，我做的时候只get到了预算是由税的2%来的，然后一个公司现在由1%的这个城的雇佣员工组成（不知道对不对），还有想问下这题在考试里大概是什么水平的题目

想问下唐塘老师，这题我没看懂题目的意思，查了意思后说是调和xxxx，也不是很明白，然后我看说c讲了两个不同状态的婴儿，对于牛奶的吸收的不同，跟原文里呈现了两种婴儿的比较比较一样，就选了，这思路对么？答案是c

想请问下唐塘老师这题的思路是什么，感觉一点思路都没有

请王文静老师答疑

想问一下may老师，如果这一题把题干改成 a sequence of 6n conseuctive integers, 那是像这样分析吗。