Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results (5) and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder. (10) Iwould like to make an outrageous suggestion that would at one stroke provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. Iwould propose that scientific archaeological expeditions and governmental (15) authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal (20) excavator's grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities. You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, (25) which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. Iagree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply, everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. (30) Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, you are wrong. I refer to the thousands of pottery vessels and ancient lamps that are essentially duplicates of (35) one another. In one small excavation in Cyprus, archaeologists recently uncovered 2,000 virtually indistinguishable small jugs in a single courtyard. Even precious royal seal impressions known as I'melekh handles have been found in abundance (40) —more than 4,000 examples so far. The basements of museums are simply not large enough to store the artifacts that are likely to be discovered in the future. There is not enough money even to catalog the finds; as a result, they 368 (45) cannot be found again and become as inaccessible as if they had never been discovered. Indeed, with the help of a computer, sold artifacts could be more accessible than are the pieces stored in bulging museum basements. Prior to sale, each could be (50) photographed and the list of the purchasers could be maintained on the computer. A purchaser could even be required to agree to return the piece if it should become needed for scientific purposes. It would be unrealistic to suggest that illegal (55) digging would stop if artifacts were sold on the open market. But the demand for the clandestine product would be substantially reduced. Who would want an unmarked pot when another was available whose provenance was known, and that was dated (60) stratigraphically by the professional archaeologist who excavated it? The primary purpose of the passage is to propose (A) an alternative to museum display of artifacts (B) a way to curb illegal digging while benefiting the archaeological profession (C) a wayto distinguish artifacts with scientific value from those that have no such value (D) the governmental regulation of archaeological sites (E) a new system for cataloging duplicate artifacts

请教may老师这道题的思路

老师，逻辑200题这个题，我觉得B是抬扛呀，原文说这个有关系，这个B选项说没关系，这不也是抬扛的一种吗。我选的A，是因为我觉得我当时设想的答案可以就是cliche在这个环境中是没啥作用的，不会影响elect的最终成功与否，这个A选项我觉得就是表达了我这个意思

老师，这是逻辑200题里面的，您在视频课里讲到的一点，这个less cooperative得有比较，也就是看钱和不看钱的得有比较，原文只有看钱的，没说不看钱的，我非常同意，我当时也是这么想的，所以选择了C

例题9， 间接法-4C1* 6C1 是指4对夫妻中的一对，是二个人. 6C1指6人中的1人， 一对夫妻* 1人，单位数量不对，可以相乘？

例17，如何知道剩下6人不符合电脑系，剩下8人不符合数学系？如何知道是哪些人不符合2个部门？假如题目写if none of the rest of candidates 会表意精确些？

例16， 假如数字变大，选出50本，不可能手算的，我的解题思路看右边， 4C1*6C1* 8C3， 为什么不能这么算？

例题16, 因为要求value of K. 1) 怎么变成条件到结论的推导, sufficient or insufficient? 2) 单看条件2，7平方不是K因子. 怎么会条件2成立？ 因为有6 factors.

例题17 好不清楚的点是 2n= a*b*c*d, 1)为什么要假设质因数(prime factor)里面是否有2.因为本来就是2n，而且条件1提到4个不同的质因数. 2)题目是求确切值？还是说sufficient or insufficient ? 问how many

请问这道题该怎么判断

请问这道题D选项和E选项应该怎么判断？