文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

PS：问49.987*9.879／0.253化简结果最接近哪一个？ 选项a.b.c忘记了，d是1700，e是1800

数学书60页32题，有多少小于20的正整数等于3的正倍数与4的正倍数只和，答案说10个，我怎么查都是11个

PS：一个数是两位数，这个数大于11，个位数和十位数加起来的和是质数，问这样的 数有多少个？

57)If m is a positive odd integer between 2 and 30, then m is divisible by how many different positive prime numbers? 1)m is not divisible by 3. 2)m is not divisible by 5. 条件1 我理解的是 M 只能2到30之间，那么就有5，7，11，13，17，19，23，29，这么多个prime numbers. 条件2 我理解的是 M 可以是 3，7，9，11，13，17，19，21，23，27，29 这些，21可以被3和7除， 我判断条件1完全可以，条件2 我不太确定

62)if d is the positive integer and f is the product of the first 30 positive integers what is the value of d? (1) 10d is a factor of f. (2) d > 6 这个题目说d 是一个正整数，f 是30！阶乘，d的值多少， 这个题应该怎么推理？

DS：说一个整数N，最大不超过50，把从1到N的所有数拉出来列一起，数字里出现4的数字有几个？ 条件1：这些数里出现0的个数是出现4的个数的数字少11； 条件2：说N这个数是某个prime number的平方

错选了D，麻烦老师分析一下这题的时态！

错选了最后一个，麻烦老师讲解一下！

老师麻烦讲解这道题 Making things even more difficult has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided little in the way of pricing guidance. A has been general market inactivity lately, if not paralysis, which has provided B there is general market inactivity, if not paralysis, lately it has provided C general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has lately provided D lately, general market inactivity, if not paralysis, has provided E is that lately general market inactivity, if not paralysis, which provides

讲解～