文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

2

as, since和when的用法区别

看不懂，错选C

正确选项E取非怎么理解（我后来直接加强倒是想懂了）

如何解这两道题呢？

What is the median number of employees assigned per project for the projects at Company Z? 1, 25 percent of the projects at Company Z have 4 or more employees assigned to each project. 2,35 percent of the projects at Companny Z have 2 or fewer employees assigned to each project.

18！能被6整出，但不能被6的N+1次方整除，问n是多少？ 解释说求的18！有8个6的因子，哪八个阿？

原文我读到：不诚实就难达成政治compromise，结论是不诚实可以说明运作良好。 最后我剩下了A和C两个选项，A的意思是“达成Compromise不一定说明运作良好”；C的意思是“选民有其他判断标准”。 当时我的反应是“C中说到选民，跟原文意思关系较近”。 想听听老师的解题思路，以及我思路的问题。 谢谢老师。

原文 我是这么理解的 想让我解释为什么水藻擅长在慢流速水生长但是却在极度干旱的情况下（非常慢的水流速） 死翘翘 。 我觉得ABCDE 都无法解释 这个现象。。 D选项在说 什么在澳大利亚会经历一个完全的干旱然后又恢复。我感觉跟没说一样啊。 不知道是如何解释原文的 还希望老师解答 ^.^