文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

请英吉老师看一下我这道作文题的找错和论证有什么不足，谢谢！

麻烦唐瑭老师讲解一下这道题的做题思路 谢谢～

麻烦唐瑭老师讲解一下 这道题AC选项以及为什么定位最后一句可以的到A 谢谢～

麻烦金老师讲一下这题C选项，分号后面的句子中is算不算谓语？ 再麻烦老师讲一下这句话意思 谢谢～

麻烦老师分析一下这道bf题 谢谢～

请老师解答一下这个ir题，感觉像加速度有关的物理题，但我忘记公式了

请老师在纸上写一下这道题的过程，谢谢！

英吉老师您好，请问您能够给我解读一下这篇阅读吗？谢谢@英吉

May老师好…117题是一道机经题…请问E为什么不可以。谢谢！

麻烦老师从头到尾讲下这个题，也不太明白为啥CD的choose sb for heading不行，以及C选项的as为啥不行，我记得语法课上讲as是=，在这个题里面Meri…这个人也可以等于这次expedition的head啊，是不是我as的理解有问题，麻烦您详细纠正/指点下，谢谢