老师您好能否帮我讲解下下面这个文章考试时该如何读，我读完这种文章压根不知道在说什么，只知道在讲ocean basin形成机制的几种理论。No very satisfactory account of the mechanism that caused the formation of the ocean basins has yet been given. The traditional view supposes that the upper mantle of the earth behaves as a liquid when it is subjected to small forces for long periods and that differences in temperature under oceans and continents are sufficient to produce convection in the mantle of the earth with rising convection currents under the mid-ocean ridges and sinking currents under the continents. Theoretically, this convection would carry the continental plates along as though they were on a conveyor belt (conveyor belt: n. 传送带) and would provide the forces needed to produce the split that occurs along the ridge. This view may be correct: it has the advantage that the currents are driven by temperature differences that themselves depend on the position of the continents. Such a back-coupling, in which the position of the moving plate has an impact on the forces that move it, could produce complicated and varying motions. On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is. Also it is difficult to see how the theory applies to the plate between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the ridge in the Indian Ocean. This plate is growing on both sides, and since there is no intermediate trench, the two ridges must be moving apart. It would be odd if the rising convection currents kept exact pace with them. An alternative theory is that the sinking part of the plate, which is denser than the hotter surrounding mantle, pulls the rest of the plate after it. Again it is difficult to see how this applies to the ridge in the South Atlantic, where neither the African nor the American plate has a sinking part. Another possibility is that the sinking plate cools the neighboring mantle and produces convection currents that move the plates. This last theory is attractive because it gives some hope of explaining the enclosed seas, such as the Sea of Japan. These seas have a typical oceanic floor, except that the floor is overlaid by several kilometers of sediment. Their floors have probably been sinking for long periods. It seems possible that a sinking current of cooled mantle material on the upper side of the plate might be the cause of such deep basins. The enclosed seas are an important feature of the earth’s surface, and seriously require explanation because, in addition to the enclosed seas that are developing at present behind island arcs, there are a number of older ones of possibly similar origin, such as the Gulf of Mexico, the Black Sea, and perhaps the North Sea.

请问这题中“explore”的动发者为什么是“Lina”呢？我在读A选项时总觉得选项中explore的动发者是“A group of films” 因为觉得explore前面的主体是“A group of films”, 而 in 1970 和 Lina 都是修饰films的。

@英吉 请问这题E选项错在哪里呢？能麻烦您解释一下吗？谢谢！

老师您好，实在是有点看不懂这道题的问题到底要我算什么，求解，谢谢！

王文静老师，我是刚刚在上海结束了封闭班的学生，周梦瑶，^_^^_^不知道您还记不记得我，我准备在9.1日参加考试，我做了一个大致的复习计划，但是还不清楚，是否正确，或者有没有什么疏漏的地方，还想请您帮忙看一下，帮我修改斧正一下，非常感谢老师^_^^_^^_^

老师您好，我看了您明星课上给的题目答案过程，但是还是不太清楚自己的过程哪里出错了。能麻烦您解释一下吗？谢谢！ （我用紫色笔框出了我的解题过程）

请问老师，原文题目当中【即A选项】中estimates后面的and为什么前面没有逗号呢？这样没有逗号不就是跟从句后面surpassed并列了吗？可本应该是跟主句谓语并列呀？

请问一下老师此题中的选项B中的’ which were’的which不应该是要遵照定语从句中就近原则，来指代Richard Nixon吗？【我清楚人应该用whom来指代】可是为什么这里没有遵照就近原则呢？

老师您好，我听了您的基础课解释的为什么分子只能有一个C[1,60]，但是还是不太理解。在第一个班（e.g. senior）sibling里选一个是C[1,60]，另一个班就是C[1,1] 而不是C[1,60]呢？ 我不懂的点在于 题目说是两次选取都是random的，也就是在图中大写A里选出姐姐，不代表一定会在小写a 里选中她对应的妹妹呀？ 这里我比较糊，能麻烦老师您解释一下吗？谢谢！

老师，数学基础课这题 在可重复使用letter时，为什么在two letter code时不用✖️A[2,2]，在three letter code时 不用✖️A[3,3]呢？ 我是知道 当需要“选，拿，取”时，我们要用C，；但是我对具体什么时候需要用到A 还是有些模糊。能不能麻烦老师您解释一下我们什么时候会用到A？特别是在我们已经用到C后，什么时候需要在C基础上 再✖️A（e.g. C[3,26]✖️A[3,3]）？ 谢谢！

老师，能麻烦您解释一下您在数学基础课上说的 “因为k+7 可以整除3，所以整个式子可整除3” 的原因是什么吗？这里为什么可以直接判断出 k（k+7）可以被2整除呢？谢谢！