不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

老师请问这个问题如何解答

请Tina老师讲解。这个题目问法第一次遇到，说下面哪个不是削弱。这种问法相当于在问哪个是支持或者无关吗？做题时觉得AB都是与原文逻辑无关选项。CDE都在解释一个城市与另一个相比，心脏相关手术的成本因素不同，感觉都与原文相关，但是也不是削弱。这个题目感觉摸不着方向

请王文静老师解答。我理的逻辑链：因为热的地方容易缺水，且全球变暖让温度更高，所以肾结石病会增加。我选的E，说天气热的地方结石病多，冷的地方少。A选项给我感觉是因果倒置，病多的地方，天气热，反了。请老师讲解这个题的正确解题思路，并且指出我的错误在哪，如何避免

C选项的It为什么是指代不清呀

金老师好，当时看B觉得to conquer 的发起者是登山者，不应是hazards，但是根据including觉得是hazards包括这几个事，E从语法上成了amateur including了，这个Ving找动作发起者的规则这里不适用吗？

请老师讲一下思路

请老师讲下第七题思路。我的理解是条件1可以判断，想要成立则xy的个位数应该是5或者0，这样次方之后依然是5或者0，即xy的个位应该相等，所以答案是No。老师，我是错误理解题意了吗？

徐老师讲下第六题，是用捆绑法吗？做这种题特别没有思路，怎么办？

求问解题思路

请问这两题的解题思路