不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

第一题我好像没在文章中找到两者的对比呀 只是说了vertical的是single group，这种细节题只能从文章中仔细找嘛？希望张老师回答一下

这个题A和C怎么选出来呢 希望唐老师回答一下

提问唐瑭老师，469这道题我选的c，做题思路：首先看问题是问DP改进了一个关于mon的什么事情？然后原文定位到红框里，最后对比选项，现在感觉D也有点对，请问下老师思路哪里出现了问题？

求问解题思路

求问解题思路

老师我算完得4，求问出错在哪里？（右图为解题过程）

提问这道题解题方法

老师提问这道题解题方法

求问解题思路

求问解题思路