不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

16题 ps 不太明白怎么算 感觉要求很复杂

想让老师用相关性方法讲一下

想让老师用相关性来解这道题

请问张慧雯老师，文章的句间逻辑关系写成这样子可以吗

老师能解释一下为什么A选项反驳了原文的论点吗

老师，我不理解A选项为什么不能反驳原文。原文的意思是评论家认为EI没有意识到自己有散光所以造成他的画作人物不正常的细长，那A选项的意思就是正是因为不能确定EI有没有意识到自己有散光，如果他意识到并去修复的话细长人物的风格就不是因为散光造成的。同时我也不懂D选项如何反驳了原文的解释

这题怎么做 没有思路

13题W为什么错？14题为什么说削弱三个假设就是与主旨相反的意思？我选了E不太明白为什么选A

为什么条件（2）可以整除2

请问may老师这道题的思路