不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

想问一下老师这题的定位思路是如何的，大后天就考了。答案是C，还想听一下D的话为什么不能选

想问下老师这题的思路。为什么B选项不对，对于比例是没办法说明坏的多还是少，需要一个说人数一样多来补充证明说motorized确实比non m多。为什么要D

想问下老师这题的思路是怎么的，assumption的题目应该怎么做，之前是老师的方法是说把assumption看成是一个argument的补充原因，好像在这里用不上？有点急

想问下老师这题的思路是怎么样的，快考试了有点急

想让老师理一下这篇阅读的文章结构还有解决下第4题

想问问唐塘老师这题思路是什么样的，我做的时候只get到了预算是由税的2%来的，然后一个公司现在由1%的这个城的雇佣员工组成（不知道对不对），还有想问下这题在考试里大概是什么水平的题目

想问下唐塘老师，这题我没看懂题目的意思，查了意思后说是调和xxxx，也不是很明白，然后我看说c讲了两个不同状态的婴儿，对于牛奶的吸收的不同，跟原文里呈现了两种婴儿的比较比较一样，就选了，这思路对么？答案是c

想请问下唐塘老师这题的思路是什么，感觉一点思路都没有

请王文静老师答疑

想问一下may老师，如果这一题把题干改成 a sequence of 6n conseuctive integers, 那是像这样分析吗。