According to a theory advanced by researcher Paul Martin，the wave of species extinctions that occurred in North America about 11,000 years ago，at the end of the Pleistocene era，can be directly attributed to the arrival of humans，i.e.，the Paleoindians， who were ancestors of modern Native Americans. However，anthropologist Shepard Krech points out that large animal species vanished even in areas where there is no evidence to demonstrate that Paleoindians hunted them.Nor were extinctions confined to large animals： small animals，plants，and insects disappeared，presumably not all through human consumption. Krech also contradicts Martin's exclusion of climatic change as an explanation by asserting that widespread climatic change did indeed occur at the end of the Pleistocene. Still，Krech attributes secondary if not primary responsibility for the extinctions to the Paleoindians，arguing that humans have produced local extinctions elsewhere.But，according to historian Richard White，even the attribution of secondary responsibility may not be supported by the evidence. White observes that Martin's thesis depends on coinciding dates for the arrival of humans and the decline of large animal species，and Krech，though aware that the dates are controversial，does not challenge them；yet recent archaeological discoveries are providing evidence that the date of human arrival was much earlier than 11,000 years ago. 　3. In the last sentence of the passage， the author refers to “recent archaeological discoveries” (lines 27-30) most probably in order to 　　(A) Refute White's suggestion that neither Martin nor Krech adequately account for Paleoindians' contributions to the Pleistocene extinctions 　　(B) Cast doubt on the possibility that a more definitive theory regarding the causes of the Pleistocene extinctions may be forthcoming 　　(C) Suggest that Martin's， Krech's， and White's theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions are all open to question 　　(D) Call attention to the most controversial aspect of all the current theories regarding the Pleistocene extinctions 　　(E) Provide support for White's questioning of both Martin's and Krech's positions regarding the role of Paleoindians in the Pleistocene extinctions 老师，我在做这道题的时候，首先定位到最后一句觉得没说什么重点，就有个yet转折，可能这是用来驳斥前面的某些观点的。所以看选项找有没有驳斥的意思的， 发现5个选项全都在驳斥。。。心里慌了往前找。再回去找的时候时间已到。我就随便选了个B（时间一到各种混乱），因为在做这篇文章之前，我大体看了下原文，记住了原文讲的是P反驳M，W反驳P。后来答案我也看明白了，我认为我做这道题的思路出现了偏差，我想问一下应该怎么修正。

GMAT数学（博智教材）第62页：If X is equal to the sum of the even integers from 40 to 60, inclusive, and y is the number of even integers from 40 to 60, inclusive, what is the value of x+y? X=40+42+44......60=550 Y=(60-40)/2+1=11, 答案应该是561，为什么书后面的答案显示是560？

数学书61页36题，一个男的卖每条7块的领带和每件14元的衬衫。如果他总共卖了10件，110元，求卖了几条领带？ 我得小数，选项里没有。

DS：5个数中 median 小于 average ；另外7个数也median 小于 average，然后这12个数没有重复的，12个数放在一个数集里面，问是不是median 小于average？ 条件1：7个的average 小于 5个的average 条件2：7个的median 小于 5个的 median

DS：一个三位数xyz是9的倍数，问x+y+z=9？ 条件1：x+y+z<15 条件2：x+y+z>8

question

这种ds题目里面有比例关系的我特别弱，老师能帮我梳理一下这种题拿到药怎么入手吗

老师这个题目帮我讲解一下，机经答案我看了还是不明白。

这个题目机经写的特别复杂，老师能帮我讲一下吗

老师，能帮我梳理一下这个题目吗

题目：of the 200 students at college T majoring in one or more of the sciences, 130 are majoring in chemistry and 150 majoring in biology. If at least 30 of the students are not majoring in either chemistry or biology, then the number students majoring in both biology and chemistry could be any number from a) 20 to 50 b) 40 to 70 c) 50 to 130 d) 110 to 130 e) 110 to 150 问题：这道题能理解到是用集合的知识点，但是无论怎么做都无法突破，得到最后结果。还请老师讲解。谢谢