文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

王文静老师您好！这道题目我看不出考点，我做题的思路一个是conclude后面跟by还是with，没想到可以to。然后impose不知道是哪个形式比较好？求老师指教

王文静老师您好，这道题目我做题的时候看到了and想到了可能是考平行，但是我记得之前做题好像and后面再加that的话句子算redudant，that..and that这种结构是固定结构吗？求老师指教，谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

请郭老师解答 谢谢

麻烦老师帮我解决一下这一题，看ABCD这个走向，它主要是想进一步说明一下w是怎么样的。A主要是错在where 不能修饰society CD主要错在就近修饰W的话，主谓不一致。E答案，犹豫了一下，就是living按照语法规则修饰到yellow也是合理的，所以E被排除掉的理由是从and这个并列上来看，是因为it 没有能指代的名词吗？因为前面不管是YJ 还是SPECIES 或 w都是复数的形式