文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

圈出来的部分，说是用that不用which，但是没明白为什么

曼哈顿里的例句 A hard worker and loyal team player, the new project was managed by Sue. 书上说的是前面的modifier会错误修饰project,但平时阅读的时候读到这个是能够判断这个修饰语是不会用来修饰project的，会对阅读产生阻碍但不会令人误解。因此想问Gmat语法中这种例子是绝对不对还是不优呢。

还请MAY老师帮忙解答下这道题，我选的B，没弄明白，谢谢

请问数学老师 为什么这个题不是0.8*0.4+0.2*0.6。因为两个不同时发生啊

请问数学老师 这个题为什么不能直接是九分之二

请数学老师解答。这个题您没答完吗？这是系统出问题了吗？

请数学老师解答条件2为什么可以

请数学老师讲解 条件1为什么可行 谢谢

请数学老师讲解思路 谢谢

请数学老师讲下思路，这个题我始终都无法算出正确结果