文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

第8题的思路是以BC为底，从F向BC做垂线，跟BC交点H，FH为三角形FBC的高。然后三角形BFH跟三角形BDC相似，h：30=BF：BD，但是BF长度未知，望老师解答。

求问此题：DS：一个矩形地毯问面积是否大于160？ 条件1：对角线>21 条件2：至少有一条边大于8 谢谢！

求问此题的详细解法。谢谢老师~！

下面那个圆的半径我求不出来。请老师答疑！谢谢！

请问这道题是选E吗（答案我给忘了）？一个数N是否能被4！的三次方整除 1）这个数能被6！的二次方整除 2）这个数能被9！整除

5^500 + 5^501 + 5^502 + 5^503 最大的质因子是多少？求具体解法！谢谢老师！

求问此题：一个正方体，选三条不在同一顶点的棱涂成红色，问有几种方法？我的计算过程是C(12,1)*C(7,1)*C(2,1)=168.不知道思路正确与否，请老师答疑解惑。谢谢！

此题求解：DS：3个数，问中位数是否大于平均数？ 条件1：最大数和最小数之和大于中位数； 条件2：最大数=450+平均数，最小数=平均数-150 谢谢！

一个正方体，选三条不在同一顶点的棱涂成q红色，问有几种方法？ 请may回答 我算的是（ C3 12 ）-8