文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

数学：请问老师这道排列组合怎么解 感觉好复杂

老师，请问这道题思路是什么？

老师，求该题解题思路

DS：说一个女生有一些 tax deductible 其中捐给 b 让她少交了 210 的税，问什么忘记 了求补充，好像是她总收入是多少？ 条件 1：给了税率是 28% 条件 2：给了可税工资（income-deductible）是个五位数。 income*0.28-（income-deductible）*0.28=210 构筑纠结很久 因为题里面说捐给 b 只是 deductible 其中一项，还有其他未知，所以最 后选了 e，现在感觉选 c 请问陆老师，应该选什么？谢谢！

DS：n 是三个不同质数的积，这些质数都在 1-15 之间，问 n 是否＜700？ 其中一个条件是 n 与 70 没有公约数 【补充】 DS：x,y,z 是三个质数，xyz<700？ 条件 1：三个数不大于 14 条件 2：三个数里面有 70 的因数 s 轩辕十四 12/20 【122-补充】 DS：三个整数，问他们的积和一个常数的关系 条件 1：都是小于 15 的质数 条件 2：是 30 的 factor 构筑：这个好像也是个变体吧，好迷啊 ggggggbbbbbb bb 12/20 【122-补充】 DS：Integer p: is p>700? 条件 1：p is product of three prime numbers from 1-15 条件 2：p has no common factor with 70 请问陆老师，这道题选什么？谢谢！

DS：2x^2+bx+8=0，只有一个实数根，求那个字母的值？ 条件 1：b<0 条件 2：lxl>5 x的绝对值 请问陆老师，这道题选什么？谢谢

想请教一下陆老师，我觉得这道题应该是用相似三角形做，看了图觉得应该是用角1和角2相等来证明。但是由题干给的条件，我不知道如何得出角1和角2相等

请问老师图里的这道语法比较，不太明白，如何区分到底比较的是什么呢？谢谢

请问May, 我这道题不知道怎样做？谢谢！

请问May老师，请问这题选5 吗？