文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

语法题目，请指定王文静老师回答。 问题语法讲义-修饰-第十题-Psychiatrist题目，我感觉选项A.B都是一样的意思，而且2个选项都没有问题，不知道该如何取舍。谢谢

老师，这道题怎么解的？我自己的理解是，速度慢的机器有1到3台，把每台多出来的1小时加在一起除4，求得的平均值就是小数点后的数字。所以求的平均值最小是0.25不可能是0.2因此选项A，7.2是不可能的。但是不知道这道题是不是这么理解的。

老师，这题答案是D，但我觉得是C。题中说大于10小于100的整数，应该是89个，掉到过来98+9，个位数是7

20题我计算是95页，但是答案是B，99页，不知道怎么算出来的。

老师25题答案给的是30%.可是我怎么算都应该是40%呢？我算错了吗？应该怎么算？

老师这道题没明白是什么意思

老师，第12题我没明白是什么意思

这个是Tina 老师在语法课上讲的一道题，不知道为什么搜不出来。想问一下，正确答案B 选项中的begun为什么不是过去分词引导的状语从句修饰the autographed quilt? Tina 老师在课上讲的是：begun是就近修饰名词fad的，我就很迷茫。我一直记得您讲过过去分词和现在分词作状语是修饰不到SVO 的O 上的，那这个为什么例外呢?谢谢您!

One day 340 million shares of stocks were sold. Among them 3/4 are domestic stocks. Among all the stocks sold 3/5 belong to institutional transactions. What is the minimum number of domestic shares could be traded by private parties on that day? 想问下这道题怎么画图解决？

请陆旭老师回答第25题，没有思路