文章：According to many analysts, labor-management relations in the United States are undergoing a fundamental change: traditional adversarialism is giving way to a new cooperative relationship between the two sides and even to concessions from labor. These analysts say the twin shocks of nonunion competition in this country and low-cost, high-quality imports from abroad are forcing unions to look more favorably at a variety of management demands: the need for wage restraint and reduced benefits as well as the abolition of "rigid" work rules, seniority rights, and job classifications. Sophisticated proponents of these new developments cast their observations in a prolabor light. n return for their concessions, they point out, some unions have bargained for profit sharing, retraining rights, and job--security guarantees. Unions can also trade concessions for more say on the shop floor, where techniques such as quality circles and quality-of-work­ life programs promise workers greater control over their own jobs. Unions may even win a voice in investment and pricing strategy, plant location, and other major corporate policy decisions previously reserved to management. Opponents of these concessions from labor argue that such concessions do not save jobs, but either prolong the agony of dying plants or finance the plant relocations that employers had intended anyway. Companies make investment decisions to fit their strategic plans and their profit objectives, opponents point out, and labor costs are usually just a small factor in the equation. Moreover, unrestrained by either loyalty to their work force or political or legislative constraints on their mobility, the companies eventually cut and run, concessions or no concessions. Wage-related concessions have come under particular attack, since opponents believe that high union wages underlay much of the success of United States industry in this century. They point out that a long-standing principle, shared by both management and labor, has been that workers should earn wages that give them the income they need to buy what they make. Moreover, high wages have given workers the buying power to propel the economy forward. f proposals for pay cuts, two-tier wage systems, and subminimum wages for young workers continue to gain credence, opponents believe the U.S. social structure will move toward that of a less-developed nation: a small group of wealthy investors, a sizable but still minority bloc of elite professionals and highly skilled employees, and a huge mass of marginal workers and unskilled laborers. Further, they argue that if unions willingly engage in concession bargaining on the false grounds that labor costs are the source of a company's problems, unions will find themselves competing with Third World pay levels-a competition they cannot win. 想请问郭老师，这题opponents观点是在第三段，但是原文和选项要怎么对照呢...怎么从观点看出态度？

请唐瑭老师答疑：这道题最后一句划定的范围是hunt和A数量的关系，BCD能够自己排除，A项说人口增加，我觉得人口增加不一定hunt就会增加再影响人口，所以无关，但E项，A在人少的场合被目击的次数多，不就代表A多了是因为那里人少，hunt肯定是人来完成的，人少就少有hunt。

请唐瑭老师答疑： 我的思路是：原文最后一句划定的范围是对于延误来说，天气等不可控因素是一部分，但可控因素是有明显下降的，大致就是延误的因素。可以排除BCE选项，A选项低估airline error的占比，而D项，不可控因素在上升，为什么A错误而D正确呢？谢谢老师！

请唐瑭老师答疑：请唐老师用他的思路讲一下这道题。谢谢老师！

请唐瑭老师答疑：还不太能够理解为什么选D选项，能讲下这道题嘛，想知道是不是从一开始思路就错了。谢谢老师！

请唐瑭老师答疑：这个题可以不用看原文，直接在题干中总结范围：suncrop追求less profit，C项中cattle ranching高税的profits会产生比其他工业的profits更高，而E项中，开展RT的成本要比开展CR的成本高，对profit来说中间还有一步推理

请徐小梅老师答疑：

1.问题1 一个数的余数问题额，怎么看他除以248395的余数他的余数是与他各个位数上的和加起来除以这几个数的余数相等么？ 2.在质因数分解中，为什么每个分解出的质数的幂+1相乘等于他质数的个数，能解释一下原理吗？

没有找到这个细节题在哪里，好像没有怎么理解文章的意思。文章是在讲biologist和historian的explanation的方式以及biologist是以historian explaination为基础，然后发现了一些漏洞吗？ 希望张老师回答一下🥺

请教一下小梅老师，在用间接法时 所有情况-相邻捆绑=两个I没有挨在一起的情况 我的笔记上写的所有情况的表达式是C25A33 但现在自己看不懂了，希望老师讲下为什么

这题E选项是对的，但consumers主语后面谓语动词为什么是一般现在时，整个句子不是过去式么？