老师您好能否帮我讲解下下面这个文章考试时该如何读，我读完这种文章压根不知道在说什么，只知道在讲ocean basin形成机制的几种理论。No very satisfactory account of the mechanism that caused the formation of the ocean basins has yet been given. The traditional view supposes that the upper mantle of the earth behaves as a liquid when it is subjected to small forces for long periods and that differences in temperature under oceans and continents are sufficient to produce convection in the mantle of the earth with rising convection currents under the mid-ocean ridges and sinking currents under the continents. Theoretically, this convection would carry the continental plates along as though they were on a conveyor belt (conveyor belt: n. 传送带) and would provide the forces needed to produce the split that occurs along the ridge. This view may be correct: it has the advantage that the currents are driven by temperature differences that themselves depend on the position of the continents. Such a back-coupling, in which the position of the moving plate has an impact on the forces that move it, could produce complicated and varying motions. On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is. Also it is difficult to see how the theory applies to the plate between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the ridge in the Indian Ocean. This plate is growing on both sides, and since there is no intermediate trench, the two ridges must be moving apart. It would be odd if the rising convection currents kept exact pace with them. An alternative theory is that the sinking part of the plate, which is denser than the hotter surrounding mantle, pulls the rest of the plate after it. Again it is difficult to see how this applies to the ridge in the South Atlantic, where neither the African nor the American plate has a sinking part. Another possibility is that the sinking plate cools the neighboring mantle and produces convection currents that move the plates. This last theory is attractive because it gives some hope of explaining the enclosed seas, such as the Sea of Japan. These seas have a typical oceanic floor, except that the floor is overlaid by several kilometers of sediment. Their floors have probably been sinking for long periods. It seems possible that a sinking current of cooled mantle material on the upper side of the plate might be the cause of such deep basins. The enclosed seas are an important feature of the earth’s surface, and seriously require explanation because, in addition to the enclosed seas that are developing at present behind island arcs, there are a number of older ones of possibly similar origin, such as the Gulf of Mexico, the Black Sea, and perhaps the North Sea.

请数学老师解答 谢谢

请数学老师解答，谢谢

请数学老师解答 谢谢

请数学老师解答 谢谢

一家餐厅有A B两个list的side dishes，两个list都不重样，给出一共有18种搭配方式，问B list里有几个菜 条件1：AB一共有11个菜 条件2：A有2个菜 请数学老师解答 谢谢老师

一个圆内接长方形，问长方形周长是多少？ 条件1：圆半径为2； 条件2：长方形的一条边是2 请数学老师讲解，谢谢老师

请问下金老师，先通过主谓一致排除a，通过in doing sth “在哪方面干什么”意思不对排除ce，剩下bd怎么选择呢？感觉时态没法做选择，前面一个用using 一个用by the use of …使用过动词优于名词来最后选择b吗？

想请问Tina老师，这个题通过后面画线部分比较选项可以排出ad，cwith结构修饰主句主谓关系不恰当排除c，同位语be中summarize前面那群borrowers更好，但是be比较，我觉得e更好，因为that感觉又是引导一个如records这个名词的同位语解释说明什么样的一个热cords，但是答案选b，该怎么权衡呢？

请老师完整解答一下这道题解题思路，我选的A，认为后面是一个介词短语修饰语。

王文静老师你好，就这道题目，我特地查了字典，with可以表示一件事情的factor和这件事情的关系的，换句话说，C选项我读到with，我第一反应就是自动就理解为后面的两个条件（factor）是导致output tripled的原因，所以认为这句话即处理了因果关系也表达了两个factor之前的并列关系。麻烦老师指出我的语法理解问题