老师您好能否帮我讲解下下面这个文章考试时该如何读，我读完这种文章压根不知道在说什么，只知道在讲ocean basin形成机制的几种理论。No very satisfactory account of the mechanism that caused the formation of the ocean basins has yet been given. The traditional view supposes that the upper mantle of the earth behaves as a liquid when it is subjected to small forces for long periods and that differences in temperature under oceans and continents are sufficient to produce convection in the mantle of the earth with rising convection currents under the mid-ocean ridges and sinking currents under the continents. Theoretically, this convection would carry the continental plates along as though they were on a conveyor belt (conveyor belt: n. 传送带) and would provide the forces needed to produce the split that occurs along the ridge. This view may be correct: it has the advantage that the currents are driven by temperature differences that themselves depend on the position of the continents. Such a back-coupling, in which the position of the moving plate has an impact on the forces that move it, could produce complicated and varying motions. On the other hand, the theory is implausible because convection does not normally occur along lines, and it certainly does not occur along lines broken by frequent offsets (an abrupt bend in an object by which one part is turned aside out of line) or changes in direction, as the ridge is. Also it is difficult to see how the theory applies to the plate between the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and the ridge in the Indian Ocean. This plate is growing on both sides, and since there is no intermediate trench, the two ridges must be moving apart. It would be odd if the rising convection currents kept exact pace with them. An alternative theory is that the sinking part of the plate, which is denser than the hotter surrounding mantle, pulls the rest of the plate after it. Again it is difficult to see how this applies to the ridge in the South Atlantic, where neither the African nor the American plate has a sinking part. Another possibility is that the sinking plate cools the neighboring mantle and produces convection currents that move the plates. This last theory is attractive because it gives some hope of explaining the enclosed seas, such as the Sea of Japan. These seas have a typical oceanic floor, except that the floor is overlaid by several kilometers of sediment. Their floors have probably been sinking for long periods. It seems possible that a sinking current of cooled mantle material on the upper side of the plate might be the cause of such deep basins. The enclosed seas are an important feature of the earth’s surface, and seriously require explanation because, in addition to the enclosed seas that are developing at present behind island arcs, there are a number of older ones of possibly similar origin, such as the Gulf of Mexico, the Black Sea, and perhaps the North Sea.

DS：如果x和y是≥0的数，问3^xy次方是多少？ 条件1：5^x=11^y 条件2：3^x=9^y 请问这题答案是B吗？谢谢老师！

不明白这道题的总体积为什么是（x+2）(y+2)(z+2)而不是（x+1）(y+1)(z+1);厚度不是1吗？谢谢！

我觉得这题答案应该是A吧？∵105拆分质因数可得105=3*5*7（3个完全不同的质因数）∴x+y+z=15。怎么会是C呢？？？？

向May提问，我觉得这题情况会分得很复杂，想听下老师的思路？

想向May老师提问。这题我知道条件1单独成立，但对条件2没什么思路，只能想到穷举法，当p等于2*5,3*5,3*5,2*3,2*5,3*5时，m等于2*3,2*3,2*5,5,3,2，然后一个个除发现有的余数是1，有的余数大于1，条件2单独不成立。想问老师这个思路对吗？有没有更加简洁的思路？

不懂此题。已知有A,B,C和D共4个人；问：现在从这四个人中选出3人，是ACD的概率是多少？请详细解释，谢谢老师！

不理解第一个条件均值如何得出关于6倍数的结论，是连续7个数除7余数为5则为6的倍数，所以有一个6的倍数？

不理解第一个条件均值如何得出关于6倍数的结论，是连续7个数除7余数为5则为6的倍数，所以有一个6的倍数？

第8题的思路是以BC为底，从F向BC做垂线，跟BC交点H，FH为三角形FBC的高。然后三角形BFH跟三角形BDC相似，h：30=BF：BD，但是BF长度未知，望老师解答。

第8题的思路是以BC为底，从F向BC做垂线，跟BC交点H，FH为三角形FBC的高。然后三角形BFH跟三角形BDC相似，h：30=BF：BD，但是BF长度未知，望老师解答。