还没有登录哦!

[Sentence Correction]

试题详情

题目:

In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly sixhours a week.

选项:

A、chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week
B、chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week
C、chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997
D、chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997
E、chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

答案:

B

提问:

用in 1997排除了ab,然后又排除了c.因为前面是us 做主语,后面whereas不对称,排除e,同理figue不应该独立做个主语……麻烦帮分析下这题正确的思路谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读17998
解答: 金栩竹

提问:

觉得C也没有犯错,而且比B要简洁

解答:

点赞-2
阅读2582
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

我的思路: 看到had grown, 并且题目中没有明确暗示时间点,于是排除A,B C被动表达意思不明确排除, 没有疑问, 最后剩下D和E感觉都没错, 瞎蒙了D 请问, D和E为什么不行?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2735
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

b c

解答:

点赞0
阅读2440
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

我选择的是C,但是答案是B ,这里面要如何判断呢? In 1981 children in the United States spent an average of slightly less than two and a half hours a week doing household( chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly sixhours a week.) chores; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997 chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997 chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997

解答:

点赞3
阅读2477
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

老师不是说要对动词有足够敏感吗?而在B选项中的had grown是过去完成时,表达过去的过去。而在OG中有提到,用过去完成时需要有明显的时间先后顺序。因此,当时我认为虽然B从结构上更加对称,但是从意思上说,had grown却变成了在spent之前了,这从意思上说就不对了,因此就排除了B。所以想请问一下管老师,按照新方法来说,究竟应该分析动词的时态吗?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2457
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询