还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
选项:
A、The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B、During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C、Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D、Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E、During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
答案:
B
提问：
在B，C中纠结。
觉得B说的是经济强的时候，有25%的儿童在私立学校上学，那有75%的在公立学校，75%比例算挺高的，所以公立学校老师也本来比较多。所以如果经济变差，读私立学校的可能会转到公立学校，相应的公立学校的老师需求会更多，所以可以推出经济衰退，公立学校老师数量不会下降。但好绕。
C说的是与最近一次经济衰退相比，公立学校老师的数量上升了，所以经济衰退不会影响公立学校老师的数量，挺直接的。是不是因为currently所以不对，我感觉一些题目除非所有选项都出现currenrtly或者其他一样的时间，要不一般情况下这种选项都不对。不知道这种感觉对不对。
另外，我想知道像这样逻辑题的原因部分有两个或以上的原因，做题的时候要怎么关注重点？还是说strenghthen argument 重点应该在其结论，就是只要能够支持经济衰退不会影响公立学校老师的岗位就行。
解答：
点赞-1
阅读17988
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
