还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
选项:
A、The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B、Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C、The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D、The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E、The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
答案:
C
提问：
1.王文静老师，我这里接着上一个提问接着提问这道题，关于您说的取非方法并不能用个例来判断是否削弱结论，因为原来的答案也不是100%增强，所以取非也不可能是100%削弱，假设题应该只要作为原文reason的补充增强一点就行了吧？ 2.AD对原文逻辑链确实有增强作用，但是它增强的是“B向V进口”这个重点，C选项是增强的“B要向外进口”这个重点，这个应该排在AD强调的重点前面，我只能这么理解了。逻辑链不同的理解重心答案确实不一样啊，我思考了好多遍依然觉得AD不属于重复reason.也不属于无关选项，因为也都是在说装配工和产量的问题。并且对逻辑链确实有增强作用(AD说V地区装备工人数增加，V地区产量显著增加，结合B目前的装备工人数降低，但是又要产量不变，肯定是向V进口的啊！)最后我只能通过逻辑重心的先后顺序来判断重心了。 3.另外提个小问题，我听到老师说假设题只有两种题型，第一补充原文的reason.只能是正面增强吗？ 有反面增强的例子吗？我想体会下，第二是排除它因，这第二个是用在果-因这种题里面吧？这个属于反面增强。
解答：
点赞1
阅读16400
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
