还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
The average hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland has long been significantly lower than that in neighboring Borodia. Since Borodia dropped all tariffs on Vernlandian televisions three years ago, the number of televisions sold annually in Borodia has not changed. However, recent statistics show a droip in the number of television assemblers in Borodia. Therefore, updated trade statistics will probably indicate that the number of televisions Borodia imports annually from Vernland has increased.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
选项:
A、The number of television assemblers in Vernland has increased by at least as much as the number of television assemblers in Borodia has decreased.
B、Televisions assembled in Vernland have features that televisions assembled in Borodia do not have.
C、The average number of hours it takes a Borodian television assembler to assemble a television has not decreased significantly during the past three years.
D、The number of televisions assembled annually in Vernland has increased significantly during the past three years.
E、The difference between the hourly wage of television assemblers in Vernland and the hourly wage of television assemblers in Borodia is likely to decrease in the next few years.
答案:
C
提问：
王文静老师 我感觉您分析题目更清晰，逻辑更清楚。我想问下您这道题的做题思路，原文逻辑我提取出来是B这边装备工人下降了==》B要向V进口。A选项说V的装备工人增加的数就是B减少数，不正好可以增强结论一点吗？不属于无关选项啊。D答案逻辑跟A有点类似。E很明显无关，推不出E,我看英吉老师看到V就咔擦掉先。这逻辑我理解不了。AD不知道到底错在哪？都在讲V工人数，不属于无关项，错的很不明显啊。也不属于过度推理吧。短时间要这样靠读下来的语感判断对我来说太难。
解答：
点赞1
阅读16352
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
