还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B、Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C、More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D、Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E、A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

答案:

E

提问:

当时看到原文结论与失业率有关,读选项,觉得C最靠谱:讲职业问题。而且原文结论确实有说since all the processing plants are in urban areas,也没怎么推,马上就选了C。 而读到E的时候,觉得和原文的相关性就没有C强。谁说农民到城市,城市失业率就一定会上升啦?就把正确答案给排除了。 到底怎么选到E的呢?

解答:

点赞0
阅读14195
解答: sysadmin

提问:

为什么B是无关的呢?我第一次看的时候排除不了

解答:

点赞0
阅读7397
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

D,E不会比较

解答:

点赞0
阅读1691
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询