还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants.  If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews.  However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics.
B、Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C、More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D、Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E、A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

答案:

E

提问:

错选C。逻辑链的理解是:however因为加工厂都在城市,取消税会严重影响政府降低失业率的努力在未来5年。CE里,我觉得E是支持,driving increasing number of farmers into the cities不就是会hamper effort to reduce unemployment 吗?另外觉得however之前是迷惑信息。

解答:

点赞-1
阅读19829
解答: 胡凡

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询