还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. In fact, however, simply talking to other people—that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills—suffices. Evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
选项:
A、As people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them.
B、Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person’s mental sharpness also tend to increase that person’s social isolation.
C、Many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems.
D、The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
E、The tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.
答案:
B
提问：
老师：
我看到英吉老师og精讲里说这道选B，是因为因果倒置。但是我很困惑着题是怎么提炼逻辑链的，我认为的逻辑链是说，因为有研究说人越社交越聪明—————>所以得出结论，人和别人说说话，就足够保持脑袋聪明了。那么这道题就等于是抨击了研究的可信度也就是因中的问题，而非大逻辑链的因到果的因果倒置。我也知道我理解的逻辑链到这前后两句说的有点废话，但是我会觉得这才是逻辑链。我理解的是不是有问题啊？
很多题都会类似这样给个一大段实验研究，然后推出一个结论，比如OG的664，我就觉得是在说因为做了个实验，有D的那8盆比被移除了D的长得好————>所以得出结论有天然授粉所以长得好，这道题抨击的也是“因”有问题，但我感觉我这种因果逻辑链的思路会非常麻烦，因为往往整理出来都是一大段自带逻辑关系的因导致了一个一大段自带逻辑关系的果，求老师指点。
找英吉老师的话我怕老师骂我(>﹏<)
解答：
点赞2
阅读15725
提问：
不理解为什么B是削弱，我选了E，觉得E的信息是however前的，可以帮助削弱结论，傻傻分不清了，麻烦老师解答一下
解答：
点赞-1
阅读4663
提问：
正确答案B
解答：
点赞-2
阅读2001
提问：
答案是B ，但是认为B没有起到削弱作用，反而E可以。求解答。
解答：
点赞-1
阅读1993
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
