还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
In general, jobs are harder to get in times of economic recession because many businesses cut back operations. However, any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools. This is because Vargonia has just introduced a legal requirement that education in government-funded schools be available, free of charge, to all Vargonian children regardless of the state of the economy, and that current student-teacher ratios not be exceeded.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
选项:
A、The current student-teacher ratio at Vargonia's government-funded schools is higher than it was during the most recent period of economic recession.
B、During recent periods when the Vargonian economy has been strong, almost 25 percent of Vargonian children have attended privately funded schools, many of which charge substantial fees.
C、Nearly 20 percent more teachers are currently employed in Vargonia's government-funded schools than had been employed in those schools in the period before the last economic recession.
D、Teachers in Vargonia's government-funded schools are well paid relative to teachers in most privately funded schools in Vargonia, many of which rely heavily on part-time teachers.
E、During the last economic recession in Vargonia, the government permanently closed a number of the schools that it had funded.
答案:
B
提问：
老师您好，我想问一下这个题的c选项究竟是怎么排除掉的？我选c的原因是因为c说现在的公立学校老师雇佣量比上一次经济危机之前的雇佣量多了，这让我觉得经过经济危机老师雇佣的数量增加了，支持了原文说的经济危机不会影响老师雇佣量的说法。我这样想是脑补太多了吗？后来又想了想，排除c的角度可不可以是，原文说的是any future recessions in Vargonia will probably not reduce the availability of teaching jobs at government-funded schools，说的是future，但c说的是过去的一次经济危机的事儿，可以这样排除吗？麻烦老师解答下c排除的思路，谢谢老师！
解答：
点赞-1
阅读25389
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
