还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Editorial:
 
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
 
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

选项:

A、The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B、Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C、People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D、The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E、People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案:

C

提问:

…为了降低失业率,政府的一个措施,就是如果你找了工作,但是薪水低于政府assistance,则我给你supplement income:,另外如果有工作的人的薪水,这道题题目没看懂;怎么去理解有what的句子,老师之前也讲过a is to b what c is to d;这里what 表示就好像;这里的what怎么去理解,有没有类似像定语从句一样有规律的去解读what句型?

解答:

点赞0
阅读12582
解答: 王文静

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询