还没有登录哦!

[Sentence Correction]

试题详情

题目:

Although improved efficiency in converting harvested trees into wood products
may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and
lowering prices, thereby boosting consumption.

选项:

A、in converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, thereby boosting.
B、In converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.
C、Of converting harvested trees into wood products may reduce harvest  rates, it will stimulate demand by increasing supply and lowering prices, which boosts.
D、Of harvested trees being converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, it will stimulate demand, because it will increase supply and lower prices, thereby boosting.
E、When harvested trees are converted into wood products may reduce harvest rates, demand will be stimulated because of increasing supply and lowering prices, which boost.

答案:

A

提问:

when 没有in,of好,排除E;D中的Being多余;converted直接被动语态可以修饰trees;boost应该修饰prices单复数排除C;但如果修饰demand则为单数排除B;但如果increasing, lowering, boosting均平行;则排除BC;选A;语义我不知道是否需要3个平行。我不太清楚如果这种情况下 感觉语义都可以 应该怎么处理。 (之前我也问了金老师类似语义区分。我认为runners of horses可以/老师说没有human runners of horses 这种表达。大概也是我语义不明。我觉得无所谓都可以因为语义是清楚的 可能表达不准确。有没有什么文章/方法能提高?

解答:

点赞1
阅读26618
解答: 王文静

提问:

我选了A,题库答案是B。B选项中的which 有没有指代不清?

解答:

点赞0
阅读7240
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

听了录音也搜了一下曼哈顿的官方答案是a 自己也觉得a更清楚,请老师解答

解答:

点赞0
阅读7192
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

第一次做的时候,觉得只能在A和B中选。认为it指代的是improved efficiency,然后根据boosting选了A。请问老师怎么看出it这个指代逻辑意思不对呢?谢谢

解答:

点赞0
阅读7167
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

AB怎么比。觉得AB都没有错,但是A答案逗号后用了个it,而B答案逗号后直接说demand。感觉直接说出demand更直接,而it还需要想一下指的是什么。所以就杀了A留下了B

解答:

点赞0
阅读7269
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询