还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. In fact, however, simply talking to other people—that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills—suffices. Evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?

选项:

A、As people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them.
B、Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person’s mental sharpness also tend to increase that person’s social isolation.
C、Many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems.
D、The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
E、The tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.

答案:

B

提问:

老师我尝试把原文中的重要内容因素抽象成ABCD:A 智力活动-导致->B 保持头脑清晰(mental sharpness)锻炼心智能力 C 社交活动-导致->B 心智能力强 问:削弱 C--推出-->B的选项 错选D,这项研究压根就没有收集数据啊,分析了他想对比的智力活动研究成果,所以说C能推出B的话,自己的论点缺乏论据支撑。 B我没想选,上来就杀了,因为扯的都是智力活动那一方面产生的一些社交孤立的情况,没有涉及题目要求的--社交能力能提高心智能力这条evidence cited 您看我逻辑推理上的漏洞在哪里?有哪些需要注意、提升的建议?谢谢!

解答:

点赞2
阅读17189
解答: 郭培月

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询