还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
 
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

选项:

A、Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B、The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President's party.
C、The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D、The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
E、Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

答案:

B

提问:

老师,想问下这道题逻辑链怎么拎出来的。我初步的拎出来思路,还是有些翻译的感觉,您看我的问题怎么纠正:我:大多数反对党控制的区域的高速项目被取消了,原因其实并不是因为President要报复(外部审计师已提供足够客观的证明了),实际上取消是因为预算吃紧。老师可以语音或者语音文字结合,您怎么方便怎么回复。Tina老师反馈过的两道题目我都仔细听了,收益匪浅!感谢!如果初考完有必要的话,我找您一对一

解答:

点赞0
阅读15862
解答: 郭培月

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询