还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Neuroscientist: Memory evolved to help animals react appropriately to situations they encounter by drawing on the past experience of similar situations. But this does not require that animals perfectly recall every detail of all their experiences. Instead, to function well, memory should generalize from past experiences that are similar to the current one.
The neuroscientist’s statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
The neuroscientist’s statements, if true, most strongly support which of the following conclusions?
选项:
A、At least some animals perfectly recall every detail of at least some past experiences.
B、Perfectly recalling every detail of all their past experiences could help at least some animals react more appropriately than they otherwise would to new situations they encounter.
C、Generalizing from past experiences requires clear memories of most if not all the details of those experiences.
D、Recalling every detail of all past experiences would be incompatible with any ability to generalize from those experiences.
E、Animals can often react more appropriately than they otherwise would to situations they encounter if they draw on generalizations from past experiences of similar situations.
答案:
E
提问：
请忽略题干，以解释为主，谢谢老师了。冬令时太早起不来，麻烦老师讲一下！谢谢啦！
PS：一个set里，会说英语的人占60%，会说法语的人占80%，两个都不会的占10%，求两个都会的人比例？
构筑答案：50%
解析：60%+80%+10%-100%=50%，即会英语和会法语中都有会两个都会的人，重复计算了该部分，故而减去100%就是两个都会的比例
答案：50%
为什么这题用韦恩图根本解不出来？什么时候应该用韦恩图，什么时候不用？
解答：
点赞0
阅读14660
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
