还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President's recent highway project cancellations demonstrate a vindictive desire to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President's choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics.
 
Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary's argument depends?

选项:

A、Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
B、The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President's party.
C、The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
D、The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President's party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
E、Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

答案:

B

提问:

我选了E,我的思路是这样。假设题需要提炼出原文的逻辑链,我提炼的逻辑链:因为所有被取消的PROJECTS都被无党派人士认为是多余的,所以总统显然是公正的,没有党派偏见。 E选项说,无党派人士的报告是没有被反对党左右的。所以增加了结论的可信度。

解答:

点赞1
阅读15879
解答: sysadmin

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询