还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Jennifer: Video rental outlets in Centerville together handled 10,000 fewer video rentals in 1994 than in 1993. The decline in rentals was probably due almost entirely to the February 1994 opening of Videorama, the first and only video rental outlet in the area that, in addition to renting videos, also sold them cheaply.
Brad: There must be another explanation: as you yourself said, the decline was on the order of 10,000 rentals. Yet Videorama sold only 4,000 videos in 1994.
Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the force of the objection that Brad presents to Jennifer's explanation?
选项:
A、In 1994 Videorama rented out more videos than it sold.
B、In 1994 two new outlets that rent but that do not sell videos opened in Centerville.
C、Most of the video rental outlets in Centerville rent videos at a discount on certain nights of the week.
D、People often buy videos of movies that they have previously seen in a theater.
E、People who own videos frequently loan them to their friends.
答案:
E
提问：
原文中jennifer表示在C的video rental outlets出租量减少是因为在V新开了一家店；Brad的反驳理由是出租量减少不是V的原因，因为C的出租量减少了10，000，而在V的销售量只有4，000.
我觉得作为削弱Brad的选项来选择，应该在于出租量变化的确和V有关才正确啊？
解答：
点赞0
阅读14352
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
