还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Editorial:
 
In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance.  To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply.  However, the supplement will not raise any worker's income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed.  Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
 
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?

选项:

A、The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B、Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C、People who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D、The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E、People sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

答案:

C

提问:

英老师说D选项是个不相干选项。而我认为这是一个support选项 可是我觉得D翻译为:那些每年不工作的人收到的政府资助比他们每年的工资要少。这将使得大家更加不工作。 而我们需要找出一个选项说政府的assistance是有用的促进大家工作。 请老师看一下我哪里理解错了

解答:

点赞0
阅读12574
解答: sysadmin

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询