不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

圈出来的部分，说是用that不用which，但是没明白为什么

曼哈顿里的例句 A hard worker and loyal team player, the new project was managed by Sue. 书上说的是前面的modifier会错误修饰project,但平时阅读的时候读到这个是能够判断这个修饰语是不会用来修饰project的，会对阅读产生阻碍但不会令人误解。因此想问Gmat语法中这种例子是绝对不对还是不优呢。

还请MAY老师帮忙解答下这道题，我选的B，没弄明白，谢谢

请问数学老师 为什么这个题不是0.8*0.4+0.2*0.6。因为两个不同时发生啊

请问数学老师 这个题为什么不能直接是九分之二

请数学老师解答。这个题您没答完吗？这是系统出问题了吗？

请数学老师解答条件2为什么可以

请数学老师讲解 条件1为什么可行 谢谢

请数学老师讲解思路 谢谢

请数学老师讲下思路，这个题我始终都无法算出正确结果