不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

小郭老师 请归纳 谢谢

请小郭老师帮我归纳 谢谢

想问一下金老师，在句子最后的逗号后面的ing形式的非谓语动词的主语是不是可以是主句的主语，也可以是整个主句，还可以是离它最近的一套完整主谓宾的主语？那碰到题目是要三种情况都考虑一下吗？还有如果是逗号加ing形式的非谓语动词在句子中间的话，是修饰前面还是后面呢，主语又是谁呢？

请金老师讲解

请金老师讲解

请金老师根据这个寂静 看着帮我讲讲点拨一下

请金老师讲解下 c为啥不对

请问金老师 这个为什么是a 两份called for为什么不能并列

请郭老师再帮我简单梳理下，阅读的框架模型：双观点（debate）但观点（新老观点 chanllenge）。。。

请问郭老师 第二段的作用是啥？预估一下