不懂这题的逻辑，求解！ Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints and plastics. B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them. D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices. E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in Kernland off their land and into the cities.

请问may老师此题思路

想问一下这道题怎么理解？

关于平行比较，前三句是一个问题，我不太明白这个比较后面的did/is的位置，为何有的放在代词前有的在代词后？比如前两句，did可否放在those are后面？ 最后那句话是否平行呢，that of course可都指代social structure，谢谢 此外，还有句i have more apples than eric‘s apples这句宾语比较是否正确呢？

语法！老师，我想问一下，这几个的区别 Taste buds are xxx，each of them has x. 是错的，each of them has x 这里是一个单独的句子 Taste buds are xxx，each of which has xxx.对了，each这个句子是定语从句吗？还是同位语从句？ Taste buds are xxx，each has…跟each of them has ……是一样的吗 Taste buds are xxx，each having…是同位语修饰吗

请问may老师此题思路

请问may老师此题思路

请问may老师此题思路

请问may老师此题思路

请问may老师此题思路

请问may老师此题思路